If you live in the suburbs of the Northeastern US like I do, on any given day you might be able to look out your window and see a herd of deer like the one pictured above. In my neighborhood in particular, I am surprised if a day goes by where I don’t see any.
In 1930 the US white-tailed deer population was down to about 300,000. Today, estimates of how many there are range as high as about 30 million. That’s a 1,000-fold increase in less than 100 years.
What would an ideal number of white-tailed deer be in the US? Scientists estimate the average carrying capacity is about 8 deer per kilometer. The current average? Up to 100 deer per kilometer.
The shift in the white-tailed deer population can be attributed to many factors. In the 1920s the species was actually nearing extinction due to overhunting before government protection programs and national parks sought to save it. You could say that they succeeded. Unfortunately, a number of factors are now leading the deer population to spiral out of control. These include:
- No predators. Wolves, cougars, and grizzlies, which all once preyed on old, sick, and newborn deer, are now extinct in most states, and much of their former habitat is gone. However, the increase in human population will not stop the deer because…
- Deforestation actually helps the deer. The white-tailed deer is a species that flourishes in “edge” habitats: that is, habitats along the edges of forests and roadways, as well as newly-planted lawns. This is why they have been so explosively successful in the suburbs. Which also means…
- Hunting rates are going down. On average, about 6 million deer are killed each year by hunters, though this number is decreasing. By contrast, the deer population will double every other year under ideal conditions; the latest estimate suggests that 12 million fawns were born after the last hunting season. And this number will keep increasing because…
- Due to the fact that they preferentially graze on disturbed or edge habitats, white-tailed deer populations naturally fluctuate. As such, they have evolved few methods of self-regulation (such as birthing fewer fawns in crowded conditions).
So there are a lot of deer and the population is still growing. The impacts this has are not just the annoying ones that I see every day (deer poop everywhere, deer carcasses all over the roads, destroyed gardens, and the occasional deer attack).
Deer in the US eat 15 million tons of vegetation each year, which costs about $248 million in damage to crops and landscaping in the Northeast alone. About 150 people per year are actually killed due to car collisions with deer. Furthermore, deer carry deer ticks, which can transmit lyme disease to humans.
But the impacts are not limited to us. Native ecosystems are bearing the brunt of the damage. A study on one forest in Pennsylvania found that over half of all plant species diversity had vanished thanks to hungry deer. Other studies suggest that deer prefer eating native to exotic plant species, which facilitates the spread of invasive plants.
This can lead to a cascade of effects on other animal species. Nesting bird populations drop due to the loss of certain tree species (the deer like to eat the new saplings). Insect species, particularly caterpillars, may lose their food sources. Conversely, biting flies and other parasites that prey on deer will increase.
What we should do about the deer overpopulation has been a highly divisive issue in the US; specifically between those who favor lethal vs. nonlethal methods. There is limited success with methods such as fertility control, but these successes are mostly found in closed populations (i.e., fenced in or isolated) and take a long time to take effect.
Lethal methods also have their pros and cons. The possibility of reintroducing wild predators of deer in parts of the US where they are now extinct is often raised and just as often vetoed, given that the bulk of the deer population lies smack dab in the middle of the suburbs.
Similar concerns are raised when people bring up hunting; furthermore, hunters must be advised to take does rather than trophy bucks or they will not significantly affect the population. Studies have shown that controlled hunting programs are effective over small areas, but the effects are mixed over larger ones.
While people argue over what the best way to manage deer is, the population continues to grow and grow, leading to an increase of diseases (such as epizootic hemorrhage disease, which can also spread to livestock) and starvation.
With deer populations going well over carrying capacity in many areas, the risk of population crashes grows. While a crash- which dramatically decreases the number of animals- sounds like it might be a good thing in this case, crashes can be catastrophic. In one famous reindeer crash on St. Matthew island, 95% of individuals died in a single winter.
That, however, is the worst-case scenario, and since few deer populations are so constrained, the more likely one is that deer populations will eventually strike a kind of limbo- not increasing very much but still heavily overpopulated, and constantly on the brink of starvation.
In this case, what is the correct thing to do? The longer we wait, the more damage is done, not just to people, but to the local ecosystem as well. But methods like contraception take several years to really show positive effects, while hunting has to be carefully managed in order to be effective. And this isn’t even bringing in the “moral” aspect of hunting versus nonlethal methods. Yet either way, many, many deer are going to die, and the only way to improve their- and our- quality of life is to dramatically reduce their population.
This isn’t the first time I’ve written about the issues with animal overpopulation- check out my post on rodent plagues. I’ve also written an article about deer with fangs.
To see a list of all animal articles that I’ve written, head to the Nonfiction section of this site.
Alverson, W.S., D.M. Waller, and S.L. Solheim. 1988. Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv. Biol. 2: 348–458.
Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., Enck, J. W., Lauber, T. B., Curtis, P. D., & Mattfeld, G. F. (2000). The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(4), 797-807.
Eschtruth, A. K., & Battles, J. J. (2009). Acceleration of exotic plant invasion in a forested ecosystem by a generalist herbivore. Conservation Biology, 23(2), 388-399.
Horsley, S. B., Stout, S. L., & DeCalesta, D. S. (2003). White-tailed deer impact on the vegetation dynamics of a northern hardwood forest. Ecological Applications, 13(1), 98-118.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2009. Deer-vehicle collisions: no easy solutions but some methods work or show promise. Advisory No. 31.
Iowa State University, 2012. Epizootic hemorrhage disease in deer and cattle.
Kilpatrick, H. J., & Walter, W. D. (1999). A controlled archery deer hunt in a residential community: cost, effectiveness, and deer recovery rates. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 115-123.
Patterson, B. R., & Power, V. A. (2002). Contributions of forage competition, harvest, and climate fluctuation to changes in population growth of northern white-tailed deer. Oecologia, 130(1), 62-71.
Peek, L.J., and J.F. Stahl. 1997. Deer management techniques employed by the Columbus and Franklin County Park District. Ohio. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25: 440–442.
Piesman, J. (2006). Strategies for reducing the risk of Lyme borreliosis in North America. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 296, 17-22.
Rooney, T. P., & Waller, D. M. (2003). Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 181(1), 165-176.
Rooney, T. P., & Dress, W. J. (1997). Species loss over sixty-six years in the ground-layer vegetation of Heart’s Content, an old-growth forest in Pennsylvania, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 17(4), 297.
Rooney, T. P. (2001). Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry, 74(3), 201-208.
Roseberry, J. L., & Woolf, A. (1998). Habitat-population density relationships for white-tailed deer in Illinois. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 252-258.
Rutberg, A. T., & Naugle, R. E. (2008). Population-level effects of immunocontraception in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Wildlife Research, 35(6), 494-501.
Seagle, S. W., & Close, J. D. (1996). Modeling white-tailed deer< i> Odocoileus virginianus population control by contraception. Biological Conservation, 76(1), 87-91.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
Hi, yeah my parents own a farm and they have had problems with deer these last few years eating their plants. The really strange thing is that some of the deer have started to eat the tomato plants, not just the fruit but the leaves and stems. Which they should know better than, since tomato plants are part of the nightshade family. I live in Vermont, and a lot of farmers have been having to do more and more to keep deer from eating their crops.
We’ve noticed the same thing on a smaller scale where I live where formerly “deer-proof” plants are suddenly eaten down to the nubs. Research suggests that the deer will eat their “favorite” plants first and then move on to their less-preferred ones, meaning that the fact that they are eating plants they normally wouldn’t suggests that the area has already lost a substantial amount of plant biodiversity.
Pingback: Scientists: Mass extinction of animals right around the corner and it’s your fault | Green Jihad
The overpopulation of deer are a threat to the survival of our honey bees. The example I see is here in my suburb of Parma, OH and in all surrounding suburbs where no non-deer resistant flowers are planted. They are not planted because of the greed and laziness of deer which stroll onto private property and eat all the flowers. One deer can totally denude a flower garden.
I raise bees. I feed them sugar water year round or else they would be unable to build the honey stores necessary for them to survive the winter. This inability to fully feed themselves is due to the deer denuding all flowers planted anywhere but inside fenced walls.
Pingback: The Overrun of Deer – Connect 2 Conserve
The result of killing their naturel animies like wolves
Pingback: The Avalon Post : Deer oh Deer: The Cervine Overpopulation in Suburbia
Pingback: Deer is Australia - Shooters Forum
Tell the DNR to stop raising the deer populations so that hunters can have more targets to shoot
Jessica is right on target (pardon the pun). Wildlife Agencies and state DNR’s are dependent on the sale of licenses for their survival. Like any other business, if you make your money selling books, you want more books to sell. Agencies therefore boost populations of game species to ridiculous numbers by various means:
1) Predator extermination. What the author doesn’t mention is that the wolves, cougars, and grizzlies that could be helping with this problem were INTENTIONALLY driven to extinction or near extirpation. Every state in the Union has some type of “predator control program” to eliminate hunters’ competition for “their” deer. In many states, coyotes are now ungulates’ only predator, but rather than being appreciative of the role they play in removing the sick and weak (thereby strengthening herds), those states instead sanction open seasons on coyotes–literally a 24/7/365 killing frenzy fueled by the perpetuation of myths that coyotes are eating everyone’s pets and kids and can only be controlled through removal by hunting. Coyote killing contests and “predator derbies” take place in almost every state in direct opposition to the “fair chase,” “anti-wanton waste,” and “legitimate purpose” claims hunters go on and on about, yet this proves killing for them is purely a blood lust.
2) The use of population modeling software. These proprietary applications allow agencies to predict and manipulate birth rates and fawn recruitment through careful timing of hunting seasons so that the removal of adults in the fall/winter result in less competition for food, thus providing ideal conditions so deer will produce a bumper crop of offspring the following year.
3) Clear-cutting and controlled burns. The “deforestation” described in this post is not just to make room for human construction, but is done intentionally to create the browse and edge habitat deer prefer. It also brings them closer to roadways. Anyone who has ever hit a deer or had a loved one killed in a deer-vehicle collision should be able to sue their state wildlife agency for intentionally creating the hazard, but instead they use it as yet another reason we need to “kill more deer.” States also have sovereign immunity built into their wildlife management programs for this very reason–to avoid lawsuits for the deliberate and calculated harm to which they expose innocent people.
4) Many DNRs will establish winter food plots to ensure as many as possible live through tough winters to become profitable targets next season. This flies in the face of the laws that prohibit the general public from feeding wildlife (but allows many species to be baited for hunting purposes, just one of many double-standards you’ll find in wildlife management). Food plots also bring animals into unnaturally close proximity to each other and have been responsible for the spread of many diseases, including the deadly CWD.
Make no mistake–wildlife agencies have no desire to REDUCE game species’ populations which is why they refer to it as population CONTROL. Populations are controlled for one purpose only–to satisfy their paying customers. The bottom line is that we don’t HAVE to have an overpopulation of deer, but as long as a tiny percentage of the population (in some states it’s less than .05%) has 100% of the say in how wildlife is “managed” for fun and profit, it’s unlikely the problem will get better anytime soon.
Pingback: If You Want To Get Into Hunting And Fishing, Start Here, Not With The Washington Post · AntiMSM
Pingback: If You Want To Get Into Hunting And Fishing, Start Here, Not With The Washington Post – DBF Media
Pingback: If You Want To Get Into Hunting, Start Here, Not With The Washington Post – Full Magazine
I always see how this species over population causes this and that species over population causes that. I never see how human over population needs to be controlled. what a bunch of narcissistic bull.
Proof the mathematics. 300,000 deer to 30 million deer is a 100 fold increase, not 1,000 fold. Yes less than 100 years. From 1930 to 2014 is 84 years.
thx,this helped me for a school project
Pingback: Broken Arrow Ranch: Ecological Services While Thriving Financially
Pingback: 30 Surprising Deer Accidents Statistics